RAF’s refusal to pay compensation breached surviving partner’s human rights
- Related Member(s):
- Chris Buttler QC, Raj Desai
- Related Practice Area(s):
- Human Rights, Discrimination and Equality, Public Law
Langford v Secretary of State for Defence
The Court of Appeal today unanimously held that an exclusionary rule in the armed services pension scheme led to unlawful discrimination against the surviving partner of a deceased officer. The Appellant was the surviving partner of Air Commodore Christopher Green. They had been in a committed relationship for 15 years when he suddenly and unexpectedly died in service. Relying on the exclusionary rule, the RAF refused to pay compensation because the Appellant had not formally dissolved a moribund marriage.
The Court of Appeal held that the application of the exclusionary rule unjustifiably discriminated against the Appellant, in breach of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgment is of wider significance because the rule is widely replicated across public sector pension and compensation schemes.
Chris Buttler and Raj Desai of Matrix appeared for Mrs Langford instructed by Candey LLP.