Menu My portfolio: 0

Helen is a versatile practitioner with a wide ranging and successful practice.

She is consistently listed in the Legal 500 and Chambers directories in a number of areas, including: in Administrative & Public Law; Human Rights and Civil Liberties; Education; Local Government; Elections and Employment law. Helen was Chambers & Partners’ Public Law and Human Rights Junior of the Year in 2009; shortlisted as Barrister of the Year by the Lawyer Magazine in 2010 and in the Lawyer’s “Hot 100” Lawyers for 2011. In 2015 she was on the shortlist for the Legal 500’s ‘Administrative & Public Law Silk of the Year’.

In 2015-2016, Helen appeared in the Supreme Court seven times, including for the winning parties in Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU.

Helen is on the Equality & Human Rights Commission’s panel, and was on the Treasury A Panel before taking silk. She is a special advocate, and sits as a Deputy High Court Judge in the Administrative Court and as a civil and criminal recorder. She is also a qualified mediator. Helen previously served as Joint Chair of the Management Committee alongside Hugh Southey QC.

As a highly regarded public law specialist, Helen has appeared in many significant cases.

Particular areas of expertise include regulatory work, equality law, terrorism and national security, education law, social welfare and election law.

Helen is particularly well-known for cases concerning discrimination and equality questions as they arise in public law, employment, commercial and other contexts.

She is also one of the few practitioners at the Bar with frequent election law experience.

Recent and notable cases include:

• Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze [2019] UKSC 31

        • HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School [2017] EWCA Civ 1426

• Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2017] UKSC 5, [2017] 2 WLR 583

Brewster v DENI & NILGOSOC [2017] UKSC 8, [2017] 2 WLR 519

R (A & B) v Secretary of State for Health (please click here for case details)

MA & Carmichael v SSWP [2016] UKSC 58, [2016] 1 WLR 4550

R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills [2015] UKSC 57; [2015] 1 WLR 3820

R (Cornwall County Council) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] UKSC 46; [2015] 3 WLR 213

R (Johnson, Hotak & Kanu) v London Borough of Southwark [2015] UKSC 30; [2015] 2 WLR 1341

Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41

Bracking v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1345, [2014] EqLR 60

R (Woolas) v Parliamentary Election Court [2010] EWHC 3169 (Admin); [2012] QB 1

R (G) v Governing Body of X School [2010] 1 WLR 2218

R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728

Elias v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 1293; [2006] 1 WLR 3213

YL v Birmingham City Council & Others [2007] UKHL 27; [2008] 1 AC 95

R (RB (Algeria) and Othman(Jordan)  v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2010] 2 AC 110

Stec v United Kingdom

Hatton v United Kingdom

Big Brother Watch & Ors v United Kingdom (forthcoming, European Court of Human Rights)

Further details of Helen’s cases and practice in specific areas are available in her CVs.

Privacy Notice

Helen is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. In order to provide legal services to her clients, including advice and representation services, Helen needs to collect and hold personal data. This includes her client’s personal data and the personal data of others who feature in the matter upon which she is instructed. To read Helen’s privacy notice in full, please see here.

Helen is regulated by the Bar Standards Board and accepts instructions under Standard Contractual Terms. To find out more information on this and the way we work at Matrix, including our fee transparency statement, please see our see our service standards.


This year the Legal 500 says ‘courts respect her; clients love her; opponents are in awe of her’. She has also been described as  ‘accessible, hardworking and handles a remarkable range of work with skill and panache’ (Legal 500); an ‘impressive’, ‘engaging’, ‘fearless and tactical advocate’, who combines creative arguments, a clear forensic style and an understanding and empathetic approach to clients (Chambers & Partners).