Merged sentences for unspecified offences could fall foul of the Extradition Act 2003, s 2(6)(b) requirement that the ‘particulars of conviction’ be clear
Edutanu v Iasi Court of Law  EWCA 124 (Admin)
- Related Member(s):
- Related Practice Area(s):
- Extradition and Mutual Assistance
- Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Whether a warrant which did not give the particulars of the offence which had been merged with the offences for which return was sought was contrary to the Extradition Act 2003, s 2(6)(b) requirement that European arrest warrants contain “particulars of conviction”.
Julian Knowles QC was involved in this case.