The appellant contended that the Charging Announcement published by the respondent, although substantially true, contained words with a separate defamatory ‘sting’ which indicated that he was involved in the production of indecent images of children. The Court dismissed the appeal.
Gavin Millar QC was involved in this case.
-
[2017] EWCA 1529 Civhttps://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Bukovsky-v-CPS.doc