Court: Queen's Bench Division (Media and Communications List)

News article about Conservative Member made allegation of “strong grounds to suspect” anti-semitism

Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers [2019] EWHC 2947 (QB)

This claim concerned an article published by it on the Mail Online website on and after 15 August 2018 under the headline:

“EXCLUSIVE: Top Tory peer’s appearance at Corbyn’s ‘hate conference’ in Tunisia comes after YEARS of rubbing shoulders with Islamists, hate preachers and Holocaust deniers”.

Following pre-action correspondence, the parties agreed to a trial of preliminary issues in relation to the following:

1. what meaning(s) the words and photographs complained of bear; and
2. whether the words and photographs complained of, in the meanings found, are statements of fact or expressions of opinion.

Held: The article was essentially factual reporting of the claimant’s conduct, coupled with some express and implied conclusions about its significance.

The natural and ordinary meaning of the words and photographs complained of, in their context, is that the claimant has a long history of support for, or close association with, people and organisations that express or hold anti-Semitic and other extremist views and attitudes. Despite his attempts to explain it, the article:

i. provides strong grounds for suspecting that the claimant is secretly an anti-Semite who approves of and sympathises with Holocaust denial, Islamist jihad and hatepreaching, which he is prepared knowingly and actively to support;
ii. is shocking and disturbing.

Damages won for leaked allegations of corruption when Claimant had not been charged for any offences

ZXC v Bloomberg [2019] EWHC 970 (QB)

International businessman (identified as ZXC) wins damages and injunction for misuse of private information in important High Court judgment against Bloomberg LP arising from 2016 publication of article detailing leaked allegations of corruption/fraud from a law enforcement investigation, at a time when the Claimant had not been charged with any offences.  This judgment builds on and develops the principles in Richard v. BBC both in relation to the privacy rights of those under active criminal investigation and the appropriate remedies.  

Approach in determining whether statements of opinion met the serious harm threshold under the Defamation Act 2013, s 1

Morgan v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 1725 (QB)

This was a libel claim brought by Steve Morgan CBE against Associated Newspapers Limited, the publishers of the Daily Mail, over an article that appeared in the print edition and (with some minor differences) also online on 24 Aug 2017 under the headline: “Building tycoons using staff discounts to snap up homes meant for families”. […]

Court agrees to strike out parts of a defence claim in libel case against the BBC

Miah v British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) [2018] EWHC 1054 (QB)

This was an application to strike out parts of the BBC’s truth defence to a claim for libel brought by Dr Rina Miah, a general practitioner who used to run Harbottle Surgery in Northumberland. The claim was also for misuse of private information and breach of the data protection act. The Court held that some […]

Court delivers ruling in ‘right to be forgotten’, applying CJEU’s Google Spain case

NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB)

This case concerns “right to be forgotten” or, more accurately, the right to have personal information “delisted” or “deindexed” by the operators of internet search engines (“ISEs”). The claims were made under data protection law and the English law tort of misuse of private information. The two claimants were businessmen who were convicted of criminal […]