TP and AR (No.3) v SSWP, AB and F v SSWP  EWHC 123 (Admin)
The High Court has upheld a claim for judicial review of the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) (Claimants previously entitled to a sever disability premium) Amendment Regulations 2021. The Claimants sought to have Schedule 2 of the 2014 Regulations (preserved by Regulation 3 of the 2021 Regulations) declared unlawful in what was their third claim for […]
D4 v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 2179 (Admin)
The High Court has today held that a statutory requirement to “give notice” of a decision cannot be met by a provision permitting notice to be served “to file”. The High Court held that Regulation 10(4) of the British Nationality (General) Regulations 2003, by which the Secretary of State for the Home Department purports to give […]
High Court gives judgment about reasonable adjustments for British Sign Language speakers at the Covid-19 briefings.
R (Rowley) v Minister for the Cabinet Office  EWHC 2108 (Admin)
In this case, the court found that the Cabinet Office’s use of an in screen BSL service on the BBC, rather than an in person interpreter for the Covid-19 televised briefings, was and is lawful. The Cabinet Office had made a reasonable adjustment in providing this service and had complied with the Public Sector Equality […]
High court dismisses application that Secretary of State for Environment did not set out Diffuse Water Pollution Plans ‘as soon as is reasonably practicable’.
R (WWF-UK and Ors) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs and Ors  EWHC 1870 (Admin)
In the original claim, the Claimants applied for judicial review of the Defendants’ failure to comply with the obligations of Directive 2000/60/EC, known as the Water Framework Directive (“WFD”), for protected areas, in particular, by not making orders for Water Protection Zones (“WPZs”). Permission to apply for judicial review was granted on the papers by […]
R (FDJ) v Secretary of State for Justice  EWHC 1746 (Admin)
The High Court has today given judgment on a challenge to the Ministry of Justice’s policies concerning transgender prisoners. Karon Monaghan QC, Sarah Hannett QC, Jessica Jones and Nathan Roberts were involved in the case.