Menu My portfolio: 0

Christopher’s practice focuses on competition law, EU law and public law. He also has experience of commercial and tort law.

Before coming to Matrix in 2009, Christopher served as a Referendaire (Legal Secretary) to the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), where he assisted the Tribunal panels in the management and resolution of cases. Whilst at the CAT, he gained in-depth experience into the competition law enforcement regime in the UK and handled numerous appeals. He then became the sole competition practitioner at the law firm Farrer & Co LLP, where he advised clients across the firm.

Competition Law

Among other competition law matters, Christopher is acting (with Paul Lowenstein QC, Fergus Randolph QC and Max Schaefer) for a group of major retailers who are seeking damages and other relief from MasterCard and Visa in respect of multilateral interchange fees, both of which are being tried in 2016. He recently acted for the European Commission in defence of its Airfreight cartel decision and for a multiple retailer in defence of a restrictive covenant alleged by a property developer to be anti-competitive; and he advised the ORR on their recently concluded investigation into suspected abuse of dominance by Freightliner. He acted (with Rhodri Thompson QC) for the Cooperative Group in its successful appeal to the CAT against the OFT’s Tobacco products infringement decision, and for Somerfield in its subsequent application (before the CAT and then the Court of Appeal) to extend time for appealing the same decision. In the sphere of merger control, he acted (again with Rhodri Thompson QC) for the applicant in Stagecoach v Competition Commission, in which – for the first time – the CAT found a decision of the CC to be Wednesbury unreasonable, and recently acted as legal adviser to the CMA panel inquiring into the Ashford St Peter’s/Royal Surrey County hospitals merger. Christopher also has experience of criminal cartel investigations, having advised (with Alex Bailin QC) an individual in relation to the commercial vehicle investigation conducted by the OFT.

EU Law

In terms of EU law, Christopher appeared (with Aidan O’Neill QC) in the Supreme Court in McGeogh v Lord President of the Council (compatibility of restrictions on prisoner voting rights with EU law); (with Rhodri Thompson QC and Nicholas Gibson) in R (Sky Blue Sports & Leisure and Others) v Coventry City Council (State aid challenge to the decision of Coventry City Council to lend £14.4m to Arena Coventry Limited, operator of the “Ricoh Arena”); and (with Rhodri Thompson QC) in the Court of Appeal in R (Chandler) v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (challenge on EU public procurement grounds to the procurement of Academies). Christopher has in addition advised on numerous free movement and procurement law issues.

Sports Law

Christopher’s sports law experience includes acting for sports governing bodies in relation to challenges made to selection decisions and advising bodies on regulatory issues.

Teaching and Publications

Christopher is co-convenor of the LLM course in UK Competition Law at King’s College London. He writes and lectures frequently on all aspects of competition and general EU law and was joint UK rapporteur for the Biennial Congress of the Fédération Internationale de Droit Européen (FIDE) in November 2010, reporting on “The Judicial Application of the EU Competition Rules”.

Christopher accepts instructions under the Bar Council Standard Contractual Terms, details of which can be found here.

Articles and Downloads

DIRECTORY RECOMMENDATIONS
WHAT THEY SAY:

Christopher has consistently been recommended in the directories, with Chambers and Partners 2016 saying that he “gets to grips with facts quickly and is very incisive” whilst their 2015 guide said that he is “exactly what you want in a junior. He has a really thorough understanding of competition law and is always on top of the detail”. Christopher is described as “easy to work with and integrates well into a team” (Chambers, 2014); he is “regularly singled out by sources for his ability to work extremely well and cohesively with those instructing him. Sources feel that his competition law expertise has been enhanced by the time he spent as a référendaire at the CAT and turn to him for complicated cases” (Chambers, 2013). In EU and competition law, Legal 500 2011 described him as a “clear, concise, and natural advocate.”