 | | | |
| Alex Bailin | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|  R v Dunlop (2006) | |
| Tim Owen QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC and Alex Bailin appeared in the first 'double jeopardy' case. |
|
| Ramzy v Netherlands (2006) | |
| This Strasbourg case concerns return to torture in national security cases (re-visiting Chahal). Alex Bailin and Rabinder Singh QC were instructed by Liberty and Justice. |
|
| R v Stanford (2005) | |
| The case of an internet businessman charged with the blackmail of Dame Shirly Porter. Tim Owen QC and Alex Bailin defended. |
|
| A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004) | |
| The case dealt with whether indefinite detention without charge or trial of non-nationals suspected of terrorist activities is compatible with UK human rights obligations. Ben Emmerson QC, Philippe Sands QC and Raza Husain appeared for seven of the appellants. Rabinder Singh QC and Alex Bailin acted on behalf of Liberty as intervenors. |
|
| R v Katharine Gun (2004) | |
| GCHQ employee charged with Official Secrets Act disclosures in lead-up to Iraq war, advice on legality of Iraq war. |
|
| R v Railtrack Plc and Others (2004) | |
| Hatfield rail crash, corporate manslaughter, health and safety. Chief Executive represented by Alex Bailing (with Clare Montgomery QC). Alex also acted for Railtrack. |
|
| R v van Praagh (2003) | |
| The case concerned money laudering involving security services bugging. Alex Bailin appeared for the defendant with Tim Owen QC. |
|
| R v von Boch und Polach (2003) | |
| The case concerned fraud by a high profile Enron lawyer. Alex Bailin defended. |
|
| In the Matter of D (2003) | |
| Judicial review of decision to prosecute participating informant where article 2 engaged, ECHR compatibility of s.29(3) SCA 1981, positive and negative obligations. |
|
| R (W) v Thetford Youth Justices (2002) | |
| Whether Crown Court trial for very young defendants Art. 14, discriminatory / disproportionate. |
|
| R (D) v G School (2002) | |
| This case before the Court of Appeal concerned judicial review and alternative remedies, and whether the appeal had rectified unfairness occurring previosuly. Alex Bailin appeared. |
|
| Lawrence and Adams v The Queen (2002) | |
| The case was on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica. The case before the Privy Council concerned the prejudice to the Defendants' case where the jury had been present in the court room when the judge had considered the no case to answer submissions. Alex Bailin appeared in the case. |
|
| Mohammed and Richardson v The State (2001) | |
| The case was appealed from the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago. The Privy Council considered the felony-murder rule and the proper role of the appellate court. Alex Bailin appeared. |
|
| Sooklal and Mansingh v The State (1999) | |
| This case before the Privy Council was on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago and concerned favourable misdirection prejudicing the Appellant. The Privy Council considered whether, if the jury had been properly directed, they would inevitably have reached the same conclusion upon review of the evidence. Alex Bailin appeared. |
|
