 |  |  |  |
 | Media and Information Law | |
 |
 |
 | |  |
 |
 |
| Past event: June 2006 - Privacy Masterclass | |
| Following the tremendous success of last year's event, IBC UK Conferences and Matrix Chambers are delighted to bring you the second annual Privacy Masterclass. |
 |
| The Freedom of Information Act 2000- The First Year (2006) | |
| |
 |
| The Right to Privacy in English Law | |
| The article analyses the law of privacy in its historical context and addresses how freedom of expression should be balanced with the right to privacy within the setting of the Human Rights Act 1998. Published in the European Human Rights Law Review, the article is written by Rabinder Singh QC and James Strachan. |
 |
| Data Protection and the Media | |
| This article by Anthony White QC deals with the structure as well as the practical application of the Data Protection Act 1998. It analyses the media exemption provision and its relevant case law, with particular emphasis on the reasoning applied in Naomi Campbell v MGN Ltd. |
 |
| Privacy and the Media: The Developing Law | |
| In May 2003 the Media and Information Group at Matrix published this review of the emerging law of privacy, which analysed the key cases and developments. The book includes contributions from leading practitioners in privacy law. |
 |
| Do Privacy Rights Disappear in the Workplace? | |
| Written by Aileen McColgan, this article examines the wider scope of Article 8 ECHR. The author analyses the importance of s.3 of the HRA, the Data Protection Act 1998, as well as other legislation, in protecting an employee's right to privacy. |
 |
| Privacy and Expression: Convention Rights and Interim Injunctions | |
| The article, co-written by Heather Rogers and Hugh Tomlinson QC and published in EHRLR, focuses on the relationship between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR and the approach to granting interim relief. |
 |
| Privacy Postponed? | |
| This article, co-written by Rabinder Singh QC and James Strachan and published in EHRLR, analyses the development of the right to privacy. It is argued that the future of the right to privacy depends on whether the common law embraces it or neglects it. |
 |