|
|
|
Chambers & Partners Guide to the Legal Profession 2006/7 recommends Matrix as a leading set in employment law writing that:
This strong set thrives in the employment field due to its mix of high-end appellate and policy advisory work. Cases are undertaken for both the claimant and respondent and are shared at all levels of chambers. Cherie Booth QC specialises in public law, human rights, employment, media and EC law and has had an active year acting for applicants and respondents in individual and collective disputes. The respected Antony White QCappeared for the appellants in Murphy v Slough Borough Council, a case involving disability discrimination claims made by teachers employed at schools with delegated budgets. There is no doubt that Thomas Linden QC is “just superb,” deservedly popular and “ferociously busy.” “Second to none,” said one client and “on his day a match for virtually anyone you could name.” He was the recipient of a litany of praise, with references being made to his intelligence, judgement and analytical skills. He is an “exceptional performer in court” and has the nose for a trial. Major City discrimination disputes and matters relating to religious, sexual, and sexual orientation discrimination prove a speciality. The fact that the personable Thomas Kibling [top ranking] is attuned to the needs of his clients means he is counsel of choice to many. In court and on paper, he has the ability to put his case well and his “tactically astute” behaviour readily impresses. James Laddie is “such a star performer.” His “meticulous preparation and research” is allied to a persuasive advocacy style. He also scores points for giving 100% to the many cases he is involved in. Helen Mountfield plays a role in the set’s discrimination practice, with one recent case involving the issue of indirect discrimination. Mark Afeevais a junior whose reputation is on the rise. He is a “very cool character with a strong nerve,” admirable attributes that ensure he is unfazed by whatever is thrown at him. He acted for the claimants in one of the first religious discrimination cases in the county court. Karon Monaghan is known as a real heavyweight in discrimination cases. She is characterised by a “gutsy” performance in court and a down-to-earth approach with clients. Her “breadth of knowledge and ability to focus on the key issues are as good as any junior at the Bar.”
Matrix is afforded similar praise by the Legal 500 2006/7 which writes that:
A strong service ethos and extremely strong members are Matrix Chambers' key assets, according to clients. 'We like their commercial approach to the business of providing their services', says one solicitor. The 'incisive' Thomas Linden is an 'excellent performer in court', successfully defending Merrill Lynch against Stephanie Villalba's sex discrimination claim. He is 'simply a great person to have on side; one of the best', says a client, while an opponent warns: 'You don't know the knife has gone in till you slip to the ground'. Karon Monaghan successfully represented Michelle Alabaster in her long-running equal pay battle. The 'reliable and knowledgeable' Thomas Kibling is 'excellent at cross-examination and very attuned to the needs of his clients', while the 'robust' James Laddie is 'technically strong' and a superb advocate.
| | |